In late September, Amazon announced a slew of new hardware, just in time for the holiday season. Included was the Fire TV Recast, a clever, network-based TV tuner and DVR (digital video recorder). Could this be an easy and cost-effective way to record over-the-air TV on a boat?
For years, I just paid for satellite television every month. But as alternatives to the $100-plus-per-month cost became more viable, the expense became more irksome. So, about a year and a half ago, we cut the cord—the current lingo for getting rid of cable or satellite both at home and on the boat.
The Fire TV Recast is a tuner/DVR that connects to a TV antenna and your network. Physically, it’s a nondescript charcoal gray box designed to be stuck out of the way and quietly go about its job, and it’s available in two configurations, a two-tuner 75-hour model and a four-tuner 150-hour model.
The Recast only records over-the-air broadcast television and has no means of displaying content itself. Instead, it uses other Fire TV devices as the display method while the Recast ideally sits somewhere in your house with strong broadcast signal reception. The Recast connects to your home network either via wired Ethernet or via 2.4 or 5 Ghz Wi-Fi and then transmits live and recorded TV to Fire TV and Echo Show devices on your network or via mobile app to devices off your network.
One of the best things about the Fire TV Recast is the simple pricing model. Amazon does not charge a subscription fee for guide data, nor do they require Amazon Prime membership or any other recurring expense. After the initial cost of the Fire TV Recast— $230 for the two-tuner/75-hour model or $280 for the four-tuner/150-hour model—there’s no other expense.
There’s really no getting around it, at least right now cord cutting is a little complex. The beauty of traditional pay services is simplicity; you interact with a single box with a familiar user interface. But, this simplicity comes with a greater expense. Amazon hasn’t done us too many favors in sorting out the complexity because their terminology is also a little confusing. A Fire TV isn’t a TV. It’s a device you connect to a TV that produces the user interface on screen and plays videos from the litany of streaming services mentioned above. Amazon currently makes Fire TVs in sticks, cubes, and also built into TVs.
So, a Fire TV Recast is ultimately one part of the system that makes this all work. As you can see in the picture above, the Fire TV Recast sits somewhere in the house (or boat) where there’s good TV signal reception. The Fire TV then plugs into the back of your TV via HDMI and ultimately you watch TV via your existing TV.
Upon hearing about the Recast, I immediately imagined the Recast at home recording TV from the Chicago broadcast networks. I would then use my home and boat internet connections to stream that TV live or recorded to the boat, wherever it might be, and watch using a Fire TV device connected to a TV on our boat. But Recast can’t do that—at least not currently.
Further reading on the Recast made it clear that, at least at launch, the Recast content can only be displayed on a Fire TV that’s on the same local network as the Recast. The only way to watch Recast content outside of the house would be using a mobile device running the Fire TV mobile app streaming content from home.
Given the limitations, it might make more sense to put the Recast on the boat and use it as Amazon intended with Fire TVs connected to the same network as the Recast. Further research hasn’t pointed to any troubles with this use case. Keeping the Recast local to the Fire TVs has the upside that internet connectivity isn’t as stressed. With the Recast located on the boat, the internet bandwidth demands are smaller, though not eliminated.
Fire TVs need a working internet connection for the home screen to load, and the Recast needs internet connectivity to get guide data, but with the content itself being stored on the Recast, overall bandwidth consumption would be drastically reduced.
For me, the one downside to this option is that we often travel long distances and are often between broadcast markets. Each time we enter a new broadcast area we would need to go through the channel scan process again and update the Recast with the current market’s channel layout. But it appears that the Recast doesn’t store scheduled recordings on a per channel basis, so I believe all my previously scheduled recordings would still work as I change channel maps. However, it’s also likely reception will vary as we travel, and we frequently spend time in pretty remote locations.
First and foremost, the Fire TV Recast just works. I’ve used a lot of over-the-air DVR software and hardware and many of them have been first releases of the product, like the Recast. But this is the most polished first version I’ve used of any of these products. Nonetheless, there are some limitations and it’s worth stating those out clearly.
Several of these will likely be improved upon in later updates of the Recast software, but as it stands right now, here’s a list of what I’m aware of:
· The Recast supports two concurrent streams. So, even though you can record up to four programs at a time, you can only watch them on two TVs, Echo Shows or mobile devices at a time.
· All Recast TV is streamed at a maximum of 720p resolution. Even if the program is broadcast at 1080p it will be streamed to your Fire TV or mobile device at 720p.
· You can only use a Fire TV to display content if the Fire TV is on the same network as the Recast.
· There’s no way to play Recast recordings on a computer, Apple TV, Roku player, etc.
· When viewing Recast content on a Fire TV, the Recast content is displayed on the home screen of the Fire TV below Amazon’s own content and apps.
None of these issues take away from the fact that, thus far, the Recast has just worked. I’ve yet to see a failed recording (one I can’t playback), and I have had no troubles with scheduling. I’ve tried using the Fire TV Recast with my Echo Show and it worked pretty well, though I found Alexa voice commands to be a bit obtuse and hard to remember while I’ve also found ‘her’ to be very picky about the syntax of those commands.
The Recast uses 12-volt power while consuming between 9 and 15 watts, according to AFTV news, which would make powering it on the boat fairly easy. I’m at home for a few weeks now before we return to our boat and continue our travels, and due to the reasons above, I haven’t decided if I’d rather have the Recast with us or faithfully recording programs at home. If I could use the boat’s Fire TV devices to play back the recordings from home in our salon, I think it would be a pretty easy decision, so I’m really hoping Amazon might add that capability soon.
Overall, from about a week’s usage, I’m pretty impressed with what Amazon has come up with and feel like it could be a really useful addition onboard for those looking for an inexpensive and easy way to add television reception and DVR capabilities.
This piece was written for Panbo: The Marine Electronics Hub. Click here to read comments about this entry or to add your own https://www.panbo.com/amazon-fire-tv-recast-on-a-boat/